Skip to content

Teams

The review opens with the evidence.

A cycle reads the KRAs the role owns, the KPI readings recorded during the period and the SOP acknowledgements.

The screen

Teams

The directory, the roles, the reviews.

Sample workspace: Northwind Ops

What you get

Everything below ships today.

  • CyclesLaunch a cycle for a period, pick who is in it, and track who has submitted without chasing a spreadsheet.
  • Self, manager, peerA self assessment, a manager assessment and peer input, each stored separately rather than merged into one anonymous blob.
  • Against the KRAsEach result area gets a rating and a comment on both sides, so the disagreement is visible and specific.
  • Weighted compositeThe KPI score, the SOP compliance score and the manager rating combine at weights you set for the cycle.
  • A timelineThe person's page carries the cycle's timeline, with the readings and the result area outcome on it.
  • An outcomeA cycle closes with a recorded outcome and a recommendation, and the history stays attached to the period.

It reads the rest.

  • KRAsKey result areas linked to roles.
  • KPIsTrack, weight and score, tied to performance.
  • PeopleOrg chart, roles and history.

Questions

Straight answers.

Can several cycles run at once?

Yes. A quarterly and an annual cycle can be live at the same time without sharing a form.

Is peer feedback anonymous?

Peer input is stored as its own record with its author. Decide your own policy on who sees it; do not assume anonymity we do not implement.

Does a kudos count as review evidence?

Not automatically. Kudos are recorded against the company's values and are readable on a profile; landing one on a review as evidence is not built yet.

Open it on your own work.